Tax system, cutting benefits and criminality

Tax system, cutting benefits and criminality

by Purho Petra -
Number of replies: 2

 Tax system, cutting benefits and criminality as challenges of social and economic sustainability. 

The prediction that the world will reach the SDG goals only in 2094 is very worrying. We would need to take quick and efficient actions worldwide. 

It is clear wealthy countries need to support and invest in developing countries. But nevertheless, problems with social and economic areas are already appearing within wealthy countries. In Finland, which has been selected the world’s happiest country for many years, difference between rich and poor people are getting bigger, and the gap keeps on increasing. For example, the Finnish tax system includes inequity, helping rich to get richer, and forcing poor to get more poor. There are many grievances in the system that rich people can exploit legally, to achieve their own advantage.  

Also, the new Finnish government's goal is not to get that gap between rich and poor even to slow down but encourage rich citizens. Cutting the benefits from low-income people will affect increasing criminality, depression, and hate. Therefore, it is increasing the country’s costs of preventing criminality, healthcare, and accommodation for the homeless. Also, people living in poverty in a wealthy country do not feel supported, and therefore it is difficult to think and live to further the SDG goals. 

In Sweden criminality is getting already out of control. People living in the suburbs of Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö do not feel basic needs such as safety in their environment. Sweden had in 2018 the highest number of gun deaths in Europe.  

All this obviously affects counterproductively to achieve the SDG goals by 2030 as hoped. 

Sources: 

 

 


271 words

In reply to Purho Petra

Vs: Tax system, cutting benefits and criminality

by Astikainen Mia -
I totally agree on your comment about our current government and their impact on increasing inequity and inequality here in Finland. We would really need ministers with no racist comments in the past and that want to unite instead of make the inequity gaps bigger. Well three more years and we Finns have the opportunity to make better choices on who we vote on. At least we have a working democracy and our elections are not corrupted.
The criminality in Sweden is worrying and I hope that we can learn from them and react before the situation gets out of hand here.
Big changes needs to be done all over the world if we want to achieve the SDG goals or CO2 reduction goals OR stop the declining of natures biodiversity. Let`s all do our parts and use our energy on doing and contributing instead of worrying.

147 words

In reply to Purho Petra

Vs: Tax system, cutting benefits and criminality

by Juntunen Kim -
Those recent cuts to benefits here in Finland are a good example of how a country's social development can regress, and you have explained well what the outcomes are. It's unfair and unrealistic to demand that a poor person participates in tackling SDG issues when their personal life might be a constant battle. In that situation, there’s little energy to worry about societal or global matters.

66 words